![]() ![]() The analysis is divided into two main parts. This article analyses some of the key issues in Philippine domestic politics and foreign policy during the years 2014 to 2015. ![]() Post- Marcos presidents, the author concludes, can best be evaluated based on how close their association was, or is, with the dominant reformist regime, which employs a narrative of good governance and democratization. In order to apply this theory to the Philippine presidency, however, it must be modified to take into account campaign narratives, strategic groups, and institutional instability. This approach allows for the assessment of the choices presidents make within structural constraints while differentiating the performance of presidents from their role as patron-in-chief. Skowronek studies whether presidents attempt to govern in accordance with, or in opposition to, an existing presidential regime-a prevailing set of ideas, interests, and institutional arrangements. ![]() political scientist Stephen Skowronek to analyze the presidency in the United States. A more useful approach, the author argues, is the relational one developed by U.S. This article shows that neither approach provides a satisfactory account of the country’s presidency. Two analytical theories have tried to understand this phenomenon: (1) a voluntarist, actor-centered, presidential-style approach, and (2) a structuralist, patronage-based approach. In political systems with a powerful chief executive, such as in the Philippines, an essential element in the analysis of politics is a clear understanding of the impact of presidential politics. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |